0
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Austin Dunham
#10
(09-25-2019, 10:55 PM)Rickley Wrote: Three years doing calisthenics and gaining superior muscle mass.

I think he's still natty but what do you think?

I started doing calisthenics way before him though and still look like shit.

Pronounced delts/chest, presence of transient storage factors (extra vascularity, extra muscle glycogen ) and a very small time frame of such progress = not natural. If you have to ask whether he is natty or not, 90% he is not. Period. While he has good genetics for bone insertions, that does not translate to such a big muscle transformation.  I could possibly believe he is natty if he did powerlifitng/bbing type workouts, or if he was competing in mma/american football, but not from calisthenics. Calisthenics alone are garbage for muscle growth if you are natty and if you do not combine them with more difficult activities (say rock climbing)


Btw, if he uses photoshop as you claim, he is not only a fake natty, but a fake altogether.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Austin Dunham - by Rickley - 09-25-2019, 10:55 PM
RE: Austin Dunham - by TruthSeeker - 09-26-2019, 05:00 AM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Rickley - 09-26-2019, 10:10 AM
RE: Austin Dunham - by TruthSeeker - 09-26-2019, 10:54 AM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Rickley - 09-26-2019, 10:47 PM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Plato - 09-26-2019, 03:24 PM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Brett - 09-27-2019, 06:13 AM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Simple Simon - 09-27-2019, 08:37 AM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Rickley - 09-27-2019, 11:25 PM
RE: Austin Dunham - by khrazz - 10-02-2019, 09:49 AM
RE: Austin Dunham - by Rickley - 10-02-2019, 10:48 PM
RE: Austin Dunham - by twp - 10-29-2019, 02:32 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)