Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Austin Dunham
#1
Three years doing calisthenics and gaining superior muscle mass.

I think he's still natty but what do you think?

I started doing calisthenics way before him though and still look like shit.
Reply
#2
[Image: lighter]

Looks natty on the left, Lazar Angelov on the right.

I am not familiar with this man.

Any insight?
Reply
#3
I found him commenting on Fortress youtube channel
[Image: Screenshot-20190926-180440-You-Tube.jpg]
His chest in the before pic is as big as mine. Lol
I still feel he is natural and just using photoshop
Reply
#4
That's a hard sell, sorry.

If he can look like that 100% naturally, how would he look on Ronnie Coleman's "dat der celltech"?
Reply
#5
if they claim to get like that in short time it's give a away
Reply
#6
(09-26-2019, 10:54 AM)TruthSeeker Wrote: That's a hard sell, sorry.

If he can look like that 100% naturally, how would he look on Ronnie Coleman's "dat der celltech"?

Well he's not as big as Ronnie. He wont even crack it as a classic physique
Also he's not that big. 5'10 and 170
Reply
#7
For those who care - he does not look natty.

If you have to ask then they not.

True natties never ger mistaken for steroid users. Some steroid users do get mistaken as natties however.

But we shouldn't obsess over this either.

Reply
#8
^ I agree. I know this site is called 'Natty Or Not', but does that mean we need to obsess if every single fitness identity takes drugs?
Reply
#9
Well the problem is Austin tells everyone he is natty. He has a fitness channel and of course selling programs to kids who want to have the same physique as him.
Maybe S-Truth can make an article about him on his main page. Just to warn kids of them being fooled.

Btw yeah I agree on roid users looking like shit. I see steroid forums and a lot of those pinners look like natty. They do have bigger delts and traps but lack on some areas like chests, legs and abs not showing up. I can post some of the pics I found here. Really makes me think how those fitnesd youtubers get their physique naturally.
Reply
#10
(09-25-2019, 10:55 PM)Rickley Wrote: Three years doing calisthenics and gaining superior muscle mass.

I think he's still natty but what do you think?

I started doing calisthenics way before him though and still look like shit.

Pronounced delts/chest, presence of transient storage factors (extra vascularity, extra muscle glycogen ) and a very small time frame of such progress = not natural. If you have to ask whether he is natty or not, 90% he is not. Period. While he has good genetics for bone insertions, that does not translate to such a big muscle transformation.  I could possibly believe he is natty if he did powerlifitng/bbing type workouts, or if he was competing in mma/american football, but not from calisthenics. Calisthenics alone are garbage for muscle growth if you are natty and if you do not combine them with more difficult activities (say rock climbing)


Btw, if he uses photoshop as you claim, he is not only a fake natty, but a fake altogether.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)