Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I Got Banned on Tinder After Writing The Following Bio
#1
I wrote the following bio and got banned on Tinder within hours. You be the judge.

---------

Swipe left if:

1. You have had sex with more than 3 men.  (this rule was inspired by Brett)
2. You are fat.
3. You have children.
4. You have many tattoos.


If you don't respond within 24 hours, you are immediately deleted.

I know that my requirements will be covered by 1 woman in 1000, but that's fine.

You have plenty of "simps" to dance for you anyway.

Not me though. 


-------------------

I made the profile around 23:30. 

I woke up at 4:30 and I was banned. 

I swiped on like 3 profiles and didn't have any matches, of course.

This is the second time this happens to me after a similar bio.

I guess that either Tinder has some sick AI doing its filtering or the women were triggered heavily. But here's the thing - how many women were there in the first place in that time frame? 

How many women read Tinder bios in the first place?

This is some 1984 right there. A woman can have all kinds of requirements on Tinder and keep her profile. i just said that I don't want fat women and whores and got banned. 

I am done with that app. I can't register anyway.

But I am also done with women for the most part. I donated a huge part of my life to them - a part that they didn't deserve at all; a part that I am never getting back. 

I will just focus on writing because that's the only thing hasn't betrayed me yet.

To me - it is all pointless.
Reply
#2
Thank you for attributing that rule to me but I am sure I am not the first man to decide on 3.

When I was on tinder I was frequently changing my bio. I thought the difference in words would make women swipe differently. I think after all the attempts at a different bio (including no bio) no substantial difference in matches took place.

Then I took the time to contemplate the bio's of most women on tinder - quite a few had none, most had one liners that were super cringy (their attempts to appear witty or smart), and a few ugly ducklings had a small paragraph describing all their hobbies from collecting stamps to eating icecream.

Some of the 'hotties' had the total of two words in their bio: "no fuckboys" or "no hookups", this I found amusing because its not like they were swiping on any of the guys who didn't look like fuck boy Chads.

Overall this told me that attractive women can have no bio or a one liner. So the hypocrisy is crazy. The reasons for this are obvious which I won't have to go into.

Overall though I think your bio was spot on. Unfortunately women cannot handle the truth - and calling them out on it like you did in your bio just makes them seek the fastest escape route (again to avoid responsibility) by swiping left. To be honest thats probably what they saw in your bio - responsibility. They say desperstion kills attraction but I am starting to think thats its responsibility.

They will literally swipe right on a man that says he is a convicted sex offender (this was prooven in a study) just because he has model pics.

So for those reasons I gave up tinder. Now I am trying to meet women at a church I am attending - to be honest they seem just the same as women I have met outside the church.

One example of this is: we were having a coversation about pornography. So this middle aged lady said to me "women watch pornography because their husbands are not satisfying them" - again escape responsibility. However what are the reasons that she would say men watch pornography - probably he's a sicko, cannot face reality, cannot be a real man, etc. Never that his wife cannot satisfy him.

Double standards are everywhere.

To be honest it is kinda sad in a way that even tinder is now being policed by the social justice. You were probably banned for mentioning fat women (as if women are not in control of their weight). Thats how pathetic it is. That and the number 3 rule probably triggered quite a few feminist sluts who reported you.

Reply
#3
Yes. But this happened at very odd hours - between late Sunday evening and early Monday morning. If it was Friday night, it would make more sense. How many people could have realistically seen my profile, let alone read my bio?

But even if I had 50 accounts on there and paying for all the features, women would still not want me.

How do I know that? Even though securing a date for me is a rather hard and lengthy process, Tinder or not, I have been on many dates. The results were pathetic. Was I perfect? No. But they weren't either.

As to the church women - I haven't been in a similar community, but I worked with a woman claiming to be a hardcore christian. Yet she was obsessed with social media and always showcasing her tits which were pretty big. I thought she was a phony.
Reply
#4
you got banned because tinder didn't want people to start trend

(09-02-2019, 08:23 AM)TruthSeeker Wrote: Yes. But this happened at very odd hours - between late Sunday evening and early Monday morning. If it was Friday night, it would make more sense. How many people could have realistically seen my profile, let alone read my bio?

But even if I had 50 accounts on there and paying for all the features, women would still not want me.

How do I know that? Even though securing a date for me is a rather hard and lengthy process, Tinder or not, I have been on many dates. The results were pathetic. Was I perfect? No. But they weren't either.

As to the church women - I haven't been in a similar community, but I worked with a woman claiming to be a hardcore christian. Yet she was obsessed with social media and always showcasing her tits which were pretty big. I thought she was a phony.

I am sorry you cant find someone am sure you make great partner its there lost
Reply
#5
Update:

Last night around 9 pm I created a new profile with the number of my father.

As bio I put: "I am here for hookups."

I am still not banned. I even got one match.

Of course, none of these women will hook up with me, but that's a different story.

Apparently, wanting to find a woman that isn't broken results in a ban whereas going after casual sex with random whores is encouraged.

And then those online dating apps claim that they are for "dating".

This society is done.
Reply
#6
(09-03-2019, 04:16 AM)TruthSeeker Wrote: Update:

Last night around 9 pm I created a new profile with the number of my father.

As bio I put: "I am here for hookups."

I am still not banned. I even got one match.

Of course, none of these women will hook up with me, but that's a different story.

Apparently, wanting to find a woman that isn't broken results in a ban whereas going after casual sex with random whores is encouraged.

And then those online dating apps claim that they are for "dating".

This society is done.
Yea dating site are for sluts . I used okcupid apparently that for dating but then was in relationship with worse girl I have ever met . Sorry to hear this I know you put lot of effort with love.
Reply
#7
(09-03-2019, 04:16 AM)TruthSeeker Wrote: Update:

Last night around 9 pm I created a new profile with the number of my father.

As bio I put: "I am here for hookups."

I am still not banned. I even got one match.

Of course, none of these women will hook up with me, but that's a different story.

Apparently, wanting to find a woman that isn't broken results in a ban whereas going after casual sex with random whores is encouraged.

And then those online dating apps claim that they are for "dating".

This society is done.

Not only is it encouraged by tinder and similiar apps, it is also encouraged in televesion series, music and movies.

Propaganda at its finest.

Plus we have instagram and facebook to amplify this effect - women are praised just for being women. International womens day - a practice put in place by governments who are controlled by the elite who hold 98% of the wealth.

So is there a agenda - yes.

"Tolerance and apathy are the last virues of a dying society"

I know you are not a man of christian faith, but realise from the beginning of time women have been deceived and men have been persuaded by women to join the perversion. Now I am referring to the Garden of Eden - but think of the fruit as social media, feminism, no strings attached, LGBT...community, etc.

Welcome to the sick.

Reply
#8
I agree. It started earlier than social media which is now old technology.

The popular show "Friends" for example was promoting the same nonsense - mindlessly live and date like an idiot.

Then the vast majority of comedies followed the same template.

I agree that if women were not social media addicts, the entire network will die. The incentive to be on social media is basically zero if it's all men.

But none of this will change. Things will only get worse.
Reply
#9
(09-03-2019, 01:42 PM)TruthSeeker Wrote: I agree. It started earlier than social media which is now old technology.

The popular show "Friends" for example was promoting the same nonsense - mindlessly live and date like an idiot.

Then the vast majority of comedies followed the same template.

I agree that if women were not social media addicts, the entire network will die. The incentive to be on social media is basically zero if it's all men.

But none of this will change. Things will only get worse.
That why I believe people who are not brainwashed have more Vaule
Reply
#10
(09-03-2019, 01:42 PM)TruthSeeker Wrote: I agree. It started earlier than social media which is now old technology.

The popular show "Friends" for example was promoting the same nonsense - mindlessly live and date like an idiot.

Then the vast majority of comedies followed the same template.

I agree that if women were not social media addicts, the entire network will die. The incentive to be on social media is basically zero if it's all men.

But none of this will change. Things will only get worse.

Another propaganda tv show was - how I met your mother.

But these subtly degenerate shows have been running for decades - Seinfeld is an example of this.

Bear in mind comedy is the best way to brainwash people. While we are laughing endorphines are being released so we are more susceptable and have our guards down to propaganda.

Yes without women using social media it would be dead. That is why women are always the primary target audience of any global operation. Decieve them (not particularly hard) and men will follow whether they see through the veil or not.

Thats how it is and how its always been. 

Example of this:

Its hard not to believe that the elite are pushing for a future of mixed race. Everywhere you look there is subtle hints to white women to date black men. Its fashionable. 

The elite are also pushing for transgender to become the norm in every household. Take a look at sports and how the media refuses to report on the clear unfair advantage trans athletes have over their female competitors. The reason the media doesn't talk about it is because then they would have to admit that trans is an illusion and that men and women are genetically different to the point that trans 'women' are still men.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)