01-11-2019, 09:18 PM
Is this guy top of the range natty or a fake natty?
Connor Murphy Natty or fake natty?
|
01-11-2019, 09:18 PM
Is this guy top of the range natty or a fake natty?
01-12-2019, 12:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-12-2019, 12:45 PM by jimjohnson.)
what do you mean Brett? Not impressed with his physique?
I have no idea how old the video was...maybe it was 8+ years ago but it was impressive... I do not get it? I have no idea what he looks like now....nor do i care. I presume he has let himself go? Not that good anymore? Presume you blow him out of the water with yours then? No i do not follow anyone on youtube....
01-12-2019, 09:19 PM
I am not aware of his current state, but I have a piece on him:
http://nattyornot.com/9-things-that-connor-murphys-video-experiments-reveal-about-the-female-mind/
01-13-2019, 04:04 PM
OK reading that then yes 100% not natural...
So basically if anyone makes money on youtube from their physique 99.9999999% not Natty Truthseeker...that picture on the ebook cover is that you? I am about at the physique.
01-13-2019, 08:31 PM
(01-13-2019, 04:04 PM)jimjohnson Wrote: OK reading that then yes 100% not natural... There is no reason not to use steroids, if you make money from youtube. Get on his shoes for a minute. Wouldnt you wanna make an income though youtube? If you knew that by using steroids you are going to increase your outreach wouldnt you use them? Unfortunately, the human body naturally does not look THAT impressive, at least not 24/7 and the look cannot be sustained for long. You will someday need to bulk if you wana add muscle, so you will get bloated and look unimpressive to the naked eye, and you will eventually lose outreach thanks to you competing with other steroid users.
01-14-2019, 04:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2019, 04:56 PM by jimjohnson.)
(01-13-2019, 08:31 PM)khrazz Wrote:(01-13-2019, 04:04 PM)jimjohnson Wrote: OK reading that then yes 100% not natural... you must be *** kidding me? what about the health issues? Nowadays it is fine to lie.....almost normal...."everyone does it Bro" and no....impressing people on youtube is not my thing....Different generation i guess.
02-10-2019, 11:48 PM
Connor clearly was balding. Then he suddenly stopped balding, but also lost a great deal of size at the same time. Make of that what you will.
Perhaps balding is correlated with muscle gain. ![]()
06-04-2019, 11:34 AM
The guy looks worse compared to the end of 2016 and, as was already mentioned, there's a visible hair loss. That already is a strong indication he's a not natty. I don't buy his explanation that he looks worse because of the lighting and gained fat. Yes, lights do a lot, lower bodyfat as well, but it's clearly evident that he has less muscle. From the look of it, I would say he's (at least) 6 pounds of muscle lighter. I may have lost similar amount of muscle when I was "maintaining" for several months with shitty training once a week, shitty sleep and not very good diet, and I'm no genetic freak at all. Not surprisingly, I gained it back soon after I resumed the regime. My friend who had a surgery and didn't train (and almost didn't eat at all) for 3 months lost similar amount of muscle, and guess what - he gained all the muscles back soon as well. So I have a hard time believing that this man - who clearly has an exceptional genetics and is still just 24 years old - would suddenly lose 6+ pounds of muscle and not gain it back even though he still trains regularly (as far as I know) and follows the bodybuilding/fitness lifestyle. It just doesn't make sense if he's natural.
By the way, the guy just released a new video where he talks about his supposed natural status and the "natty verified" bullshit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzBFTDaXqys Here's a video of his from 2016: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA3nsK7mgV8 If you want some comparison, go to 4:40 in the first video and 9:18 in the second - the same pose, similar lighting.
06-04-2019, 06:50 PM
mabey I should post my body one day
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|