11-24-2018, 01:05 PM
(11-23-2018, 08:03 PM)Simple Simon Wrote: ^ "even if he was [natural], his genetics would still make him [a] superior "natty" in comparison to the average male. So there is no point in making such a comparison."
This! It's not just "nattyornot"; it's are such outcomes possible for the natural AND genetically typical.
i think we need to stop it with the "superior genetics." I think the gap is relatively small "naturally"
Juicers always play this card....he's got this and that blah,blah,blah...
Look at Sandow as about the maximum natural level. And please do not give me the "nutrition and training has come a long way in 120 years. he was as strong as you can get naturally. Now all of a sudden we have kids that can beat his numbers all down to IF and cheescake timing etc....