Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Texting Is Nonsense and Hurts Men
#1
Texting is a tool that empowers women and the top percentage of men while hurting the majority of the male population and supporting hypergamy indirectly.

Texting has been adopted by the female population as the default option because it makes them feel strong.

Once I exchanged phone numbers with a woman I met. When we were saying goodbye, she said "I will call you". I didn't expect it. I even thought that I should call her but didn't do anything. I knew, however, with strong certainty, that in the best case scenario, she will text me rather than call because women have lost the needed courage to do a simple phone conversation. It happened. 2-3 days later, she wrote to me. 

Texting is indirect, misleading, fake, informal and before all - irresponsible. Back in the day, I used to prank women I have met online by calling them. 99.9% did not pick up and wrote back - "Why are you calling? Can't you write?" Guess, what? 99.9% of my interactions online lead to nothing. I doubt that's a coincidence.

It's almost as if the call function of the phone has been forgotten. Men avoid it because women don't like it. If women were into phone calls rather than texting, men would be calling. Women dictate those dynamics. 

Texting is indirect and a good tool to play different shenanigans. It's easy to manage a horde of beggars this way. Imagine if all the messages that women receive from different candidates were to suddenly transform into calls.

What will women do?

They would have to drop their number of followers immediately. And many of the beggars will learn that they never had a chance. The ego of the woman would suffer. The same goes for the so called slayers. They would not be able to juggle as many women if there was no texting. 

In the past, people avoided phone calls when the topic was serious. Hence the expression - "This cannot be discussed over a phone call." Well, texting takes things to another level of dehumanization and yet it is suddenly the preferred method.

A phone call is personal, direct and powerful. 

A text is weak, indirect and dehumanized. 

You are reduced to words on a screen. It's a lot easier to manipulate those than a human being interacting with you in real time face to face or ear to ear.

In short, texting is beta. Calling is alpha. This is the truth anyway you look at it.
Reply
#2
(11-23-2018, 03:02 PM)TruthSeeker Wrote: Texting is a tool that empowers women and the top percentage of men while hurting the majority of the male population and supporting hypergamy indirectly.

Texting has been adopted by the female population as the default option because it makes them feel strong.

Once I exchanged phone numbers with a woman I met. When we were saying goodbye, she said "I will call you". I didn't expect it. I even thought that I should call her but didn't do anything. I knew, however, with strong certainty, that in the best case scenario, she will text me rather than call because women have lost the needed courage to do a simple phone conversation. It happened. 2-3 days later, she wrote to me. 

Texting is indirect, misleading, fake, informal and before all - irresponsible. Back in the day, I used to prank women I have met online by calling them. 99.9% did not pick up and wrote back - "Why are you calling? Can't you write?" Guess, what? 99.9% of my interactions online lead to nothing. I doubt that's a coincidence.

It's almost as if the call function of the phone has been forgotten. Men avoid it because women don't like it. If women were into phone calls rather than texting, men would be calling. Women dictate those dynamics. 

Texting is indirect and a good tool to play different shenanigans. It's easy to manage a horde of beggars this way. Imagine if all the messages that women receive from different candidates were to suddenly transform into calls.

What will women do?

They would have to drop their number of followers immediately. And many of the beggars will learn that they never had a chance. The ego of the woman would suffer. The same goes for the so called slayers. They would not be able to juggle as many women if there was no texting. 

In the past, people avoided phone calls when the topic was serious. Hence the expression - "This cannot be discussed over a phone call." Well, texting takes things to another level of dehumanization and yet it is suddenly the preferred method.

A phone call is personal, direct and powerful. 

A text is weak, indirect and dehumanized. 

You are reduced to words on a screen. It's a lot easier to manipulate those than a human being interacting with you in real time face to face or ear to ear.

In short, texting is beta. Calling is alpha. This is the truth anyway you look at it.

Calling a girl takes balls. Most men are wimps. Girls don't expect a man to call them because most of their interactions are with wimps.

Its true, its harder for a girl to play games with you if you call her. So they enjoy texting. They can then keep all their 'options' caught up in a never ending text circle jerk. These loser porn addicted males get the full brunt of it, they think after three months of texting a girl she will go on a date with them. Doesn't happen. 

If you are going to text a girl, keep it short. She's either a yes, a maybe or a no. Maybes are no's but just waste your time for their own validation. A yes will agree to a date after your first message. That's how you know.
Reply
#3
Women are wimps too. They don't have the courage to pick up the phone anymore.

It's 100% true that if she is interested and available, she will quickly agree (within days) to meet you.

Long texting never ends well.

The longer she wants to keep texting, the less attracted she is.
Reply
#4
To be fair I prefer hiding behind a text too occasionally. I don't think texting is just a female phenomenon. I agree it is irresponsible though. I have sent a drunken text on many a night when I prob wouldn't have put that message across verbally.
Reply
#5
(11-25-2018, 09:53 AM)TruthSeeker Wrote: Women are wimps too. They don't have the courage to pick up the phone anymore.

It's 100% true that if she is interested and available, she will quickly agree (within days) to meet you.

Long texting never ends well.

The longer she wants to keep texting, the less attracted she is.
I was texting with a woman (?) for 7 years. It didn't end well.
Reply
#6
(12-31-2019, 05:34 PM)Screamager Wrote: I was texting with a woman (?) for 7 years. It didn't end well.

Bro.

Reply
#7
(01-01-2020, 08:52 AM)Brett Wrote: Bro.

Bro, this kind of texting killed me.
Reply
#8
(01-01-2020, 10:16 AM)Screamager Wrote: Bro, this kind of texting killed me.

No man can survive that. Would of killed me too.

Reply
#9
I am seeing the outspoken or implicit normalization of some kind of MGTOW everywhere I look on the internet now.
Reply
#10
(01-02-2020, 01:57 PM)Loverboy Wrote: I am seeing the outspoken or implicit normalization of some kind of MGTOW everywhere I look on the internet now.

Its a first world 'normalisation'. Third world dwellers are still having sex and making babies like theres no tomorrow.

Kind of gets you thinking. If the real overpopulation problem is sprouting from the third world then why is family control and movements like mgtow being pushed so hard in the west.

The average african/middle east woman has between 3 - 8 kids. Average western white woman have between 1 - 3.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)